In a changing climate, one of the biggest obstacles organisms face is whether or not they can adapt fast enough to survive. Luckily for Emiliania Huxleyi, evolution is not a problem.
Three individual Emiliania Huxleyi Phytoplankton (Young 2004) |
Thanks to the fast
evolution of this phytoplankton, scientists
have been able to study the potential long term effects of climate change on this
alga and its consequent affect on the carbon cycle.
Emiliania huxleyi also known as "Ehux" are
microscopic algae known as coccolithophores characterized by their outer shell
of calcium carbonate disks.
Emiliania Huxleyi showing detached calcium carbonate disks (Beaumont K 2007) |
Ehux are a fairly new species having evolved less than 250 milion
years ago and are now one of the most abundant phytoplankton on earth (Bown et
al 2004 and Moore et al 2012).
Their global adaptability is caused by a pan genome which
allows very high genetic variance between individuals (Read et al 2013).
Some of the different variations of Emiliania Huxleyi (Read
et al 2013)
|
Their role in ecology
Some ecological contributions of E.huxleyi (Gorrick G 2001) |
Ocean Acidification
There has been major
concern that ocean acidification will reduce the amount of carbonate available
for E. Huxleyi to produce their shells.
As a result, their shells could become lighter hence they would not sink to the
ocean floor and the carbon in the CaCO3 shells would not sequester at the bottom
of the ocean (Riebesell et al 2000).
The role of coccolithophores in the carbon cycle, “F” refers to CaCO3 disks sinking to the ocean floor and sequestering carbon in sedimentation (Hutchins D 2011) |
Thanks to ehux’s fast evolution scientists have found that populations
can change within 500 generations in one year through adaptive evolution (Lohbeck
et al 2014). Furthermore, pre-adapted populations can perform 55% better in
future climate change scenarios than current e-hux populations (Schluter et al
2014). This is good news for emiliania huxleyi and their potential affects on
the carbon cycle.
Having said this, the high variation of results in past
experiments on CaCO3 production in Emiliania Huxleyi shows that there is still
much to learn about this species (Beaufort 2011).
Thank-you for reading : ) check back next week for more information on how climate is affecting marine evolution.
References
Bown P R, Lees J A, Young J R 2004, “Calcareous nannoplankton evolution and diversity through time”, Coccolithophores, pp. 481-508, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-06278-4_18
Riebesell U,Zondervan I, Rost B, Tortell P D, Zeebe R E, Morel F M M 2000, “Reduced calcification of marine plankton in response to increased atmospheric CO2”, Nature, vol.407,pp.364-367, doi: 10.1038/35030078
Bown P R, Lees J A, Young J R 2004, “Calcareous nannoplankton evolution and diversity through time”, Coccolithophores, pp. 481-508, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-06278-4_18
Lohbeck K T, Riebesell U, Reusch T B H 2014, “Gene
expression changes in the coccolithophore Emiliania
Huxleyi after 500 generations of selection to ocean acidification”, The Royal society: Biological sciences,
vol.281, no. 1786, doi:
Moore T S, Dowell M D, Franz B A 2011, “Detection of coccolithophore
blooms in ocean color satellite imagery: A generalized approach for use with
multiple sensors”, Remote sensing of environment, vol. 117,
pp. 249-263, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.001
Poulton A J, Adey T R, Balch W M, Holligan P M 2007, “relating
coccolithophore calcification rates to phytoplankton community dynamics:
Regional differences and implications for carbon export”, Deep sea research part II: Topical studies in Oceanography, vol.54,
no. 5-7, pp. 538-537, doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.12.003
Read B Am Kegel J,
Klute M J, Kuo A, Lefebvre C, Maumus F, Mayer C, Miller J, Moneir A, Salamov A,
Young J, Aguilar M, Claverie J-M, Frickenhaus S, Gonzalez K, Herman E K, Lin
Y-C, Napier J, Ogata H, Sarno A F, Shmutz J, Schroeder D, de Vargas C, Verret
F, von Dassow P, Valentin K, Van de Peer Y, Wheeler G, Emiliania Huxleyi
Annotation Consortium, Dacks J B, Delwiche C F, Dyhrman S T, Glockner G, John
U, Richards T, Worden A Z, Zhang X, Grigoriev I V 2013, “Pan genome of the phytoplankton Emiliania underpins its global distribution”, Nature, vol.499, pp.209-213, doi: 10.1038/nature12221Riebesell U,Zondervan I, Rost B, Tortell P D, Zeebe R E, Morel F M M 2000, “Reduced calcification of marine plankton in response to increased atmospheric CO2”, Nature, vol.407,pp.364-367, doi: 10.1038/35030078
Schluter L, Lohbeck K T, Gutowska M A, Groger J P, Riebesell
G U, Reusch T B H 2014, “Adaptation of a globally important coccolithophore to ocean
warming and acidification”, Nature
climate change, vol.4, pp.1024-1030, doi: 10.1038/nclimate2379
Images
- NOC 2015, “Eutrophication and health” viewed 15/4/15, http://www.seos-project.eu/modules/oceancolour/oceancolour-c03-p04.html
- Young 2004, “Emiliania Huxleyi”, viewed 15/4/15, http://www.nhm.ac.uk/nature-online/species-of-the-day/biodiversity/climate-change/emiliania-huxleyi/index.html
- Hutchins D 2011, “Coccolithophore carbon chemistry”, viewed 15/4/15, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v476/n7358/fig_tab/476041a_F1.html
- Gorrick G 2001,”E. Huxleyi importance, viewed 15/4/15 https://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/File:E._huxleyi_importance.jpg
- Read et al 2013, “Pan genome of the phytoplankton Emiliania underpins its global distribution” viewed 15/4/15 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v499/n7457/full/nature12221.html
- Beaumont K 2007, “Acidification”, viewed 15/4/15, http://www.antarcticanimation.com/content/thesaurus/a/acidification01.php
These are very pretty! But I’m a bit confused. You say that ocean acidification may result in these organisms having insufficient carbonate to produce their shells, yet you also say that they are rapidly adapting. My question is – how are they adapting? You don’t really say. Please can you elaborate, thanks!
ReplyDelete